PIL Challenging The Validity of J&K Public Safety Act, 1978 Held as Non-Maintainable For Avoiding Parallel Litigation on Same Issue: J&K&L HC

Date:

Share post:

PIL Challenging The Validity of J&K Public Safety Act, 1978 Held as Non-Maintainable For Avoiding Parallel Litigation on Same Issue: J&K&L HC

The Division Bench of High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh consisting of Chief Justice Tashi Rabstan and Justice M A Chowdhary has dismissed a Public Interest Litigation filed by Advocate  Syed Tassadque Hussain, Senior Advocate challenging the provisions of J&K Public Safety Act, 1978. In the said PIL the petitioner amongst other reliefs sought the relief for direction to the Union of India to bring into force the amendments made to Article 22 of the Constitution of India.

Mr D.C.Raina , Ld. Advocate General objected to the PIL raising a preliminary objection of its non-maintainability for the reason that it does not meet the requisite conditions for filing PIL and also that the reliefs sought are outside the preview of PIL Jurisdiction of the court. He further argued that argued that as the persons who are detained under the Public Safety Act have already approached this Court by filing habeas corpus petitions questioning therein their detention orders, which fact is also admitted by the petitioner, therefore, the issue raised in this PIL cannot be considered as it would tantamount to double adjudication on the same issue.

The court rejected the PIL as being non-maintainable while holding that since the issue of detention of citizens as raised in this petition is already pending adjudication before this Court, therefore, in our considered opinion, this PIL is not maintainable as being a parallel litigation.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Trending

Related articles

Section 124 Of The Air Force Act, 1950 Can Be Invoked Only Upon Completion of The Investigation & The Presentation of Report/Chargesheet : J&K&L...

The Single Bench of Justice Javed Iqbal Wani while deciding two clubbed petitions under Section 528 Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita...

Only High Court in Exercise of Extraordinary Jurisdiction under Article 226 Can in Exceptional Circumstances Condone The Delay Occasioned in Filing An Appeal Against...

A division Bench of J&K High Court comprising Justice Sanjeev Kumar and Justice Rajesh Sekhri has reiterated that...

Whether A Letters Patent Appeal is Maintainable Against An Order/Judgment Passed By A Single Judge in Exercise of Criminal Jurisdiction?: JK&L HC Refers The...

A Division Bench of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court comprising Justice Sanjeev Kumar and Justice Sanjay Dhar...

Authority Exercising Revisional Jurisdiction Under Section 15 of J&K Land Revenue Act Cannot Summarily Decide The Issues Involved in The Case But The Same Needs To...

A Single Bench of Justice Javed Iqbal has held that athough the Power of Revision by Divisional Commissioner and Financial Commissioner  is exercisable...