Exclusive Content
A Preventive Detention gets Vitiated Where the Facts are Lacking, Deficient, Diversionary or Illusionary: J&K&L HC
The Single Bench of Justice Rahul Bharti while deciding a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, detailed the “historicity of the...
Director SKIMS Not Competant to Impose Penalty of Removal From Services: J&K&L HC
The Single Bench of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh while setting aside the order of termination...
Section 91Â Cr.P.CÂ Does Not Confer any Right on the Accused to Produce Document in his Possession to Prove his Defence: J&K&L HC
The J&K&L HC while dismissing a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.Cwherein the Petitioner had assailed the order of the Trial Court (Second Additional Sessions Judge, Jammu)...
Order 41 rule 27 CPC – When Additional Evidence Can be Permitted by an Appellate Court: J&K&L HC
The J&K&L HC while dealing with a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution accentuated the conditions under which an Appellate Court exercising powers under Order 41...