J&K&L High Court Rules That There Is No Absolute Bar In Accepting Single Responsive Bid: Re-Tendering Not A Must

Date:

Share post:

J&K&L High Court Rules That There Is No Absolute Bar In Accepting Single Responsive Bid: Re-Tendering Not A Must

A Division Bench of the J&K and Ladakh High Court comprising Justices Sanjeev Kumar and Mohan Lal while hearing an Appeal against a Judgment of a Single Bench of the Court wherein the Petitioner had challenged the action of the Respondents/Government whereby out of all the seven bidders who had participated in the bidding, only the Private Respondent was declared ‘responsive’ and the contract was allotted to him. The Ld. Single Bench dismissed the said Petition in limine, which lead to the Appeal. The question that arose for consideration of the Hon’ble Division Bench was, “Whether a single responsive bid can be accepted, and contract awarded to such bidder, and if so, under what circumstances?”

The Division Bench, while upholding the judgment of the Writ Court, ruled that there is no bar or prohibition from accepting a single lowest tender provided the bid is responsive and not a burden on the public exchequer. The Court analyzed the CVC guidelines, as well as the general instructions on procurement and project management issued by the Department of Expenditure, Procurement Policy Division, Ministry of Finance, dated 29th Oct. 2021, and upon a cumulative consideration of both, it held that even in the case where a single bid is submitted, the same can be accepted, and tender allotted to him, provided, the following three conditions are fulfilled:

i. The procurement was satisfactorily advertised, and sufficient time was given for the submission of bids;

ii. the qualification criteria were not unduly restrictive; and

iii. prices are reasonable in comparison to market values.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Trending

Related articles

Supreme Court Directs High Courts To Issue Directions to Their Respective District Judiciary For Ensuring Disposal of Execution Petitions within Six Months

The Apex Court in its latest pronouncement, while deciding appeals against common judgment and order passed by the Madras High...

Supreme Court Lays Down The Principles Regarding The Permissibility Of Registration Of Second FIR

The Supreme Court while dealing with the question that whether the registration of the subsequent FIR is legally...

High Court Cannot Grant An Interim Order In A Second Appeal, Without Framing Substantial Question Of Law As Required To Be Framed Under Section...

A Bench of Justice J.B.Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan while dealing with an Appeal against an Interim Order...