Incomplete or Pending Charge-Sheet Against a Co-accused No Ground To Seek Default Bail:  Supreme Court

Date:

Share post:

Incomplete or Pending Charge-Sheet Against a Co-accused No Ground To Seek Default Bail:  Supreme Court

The Hon’ble Supreme Court recently while considering the question as to whether an accused was entitled to the benefit of default bail in terms of Section 167(2), CrPC on the ground that the investigation qua some of the accused named in the FIR was pending, though the same was complete against him, and the report in terms of Section 173 (2), CrPC was filed within prescribed time against him, held that the benefit of proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 167 CrPC would be available to the offender only when a charge-sheet is not filed and the investigation is kept pending against him, however, once a charge-sheet is filed, the said right ceases. The Apex Court further observed that once the court is satisfied about the commission of an offence from the material produced along with the charge-sheet, and takes cognizance of the offence allegedly committed by the accused, it is immaterial whether the further investigation in terms of Section 173(8) is pending or not. The pendency of further investigation would not vitiate the charge-sheet and would not entitle the accused to default bail for the reason of it being incomplete.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Trending

Related articles

Supreme Court Directs High Courts To Issue Directions to Their Respective District Judiciary For Ensuring Disposal of Execution Petitions within Six Months

The Apex Court in its latest pronouncement, while deciding appeals against common judgment and order passed by the Madras High...

Supreme Court Lays Down The Principles Regarding The Permissibility Of Registration Of Second FIR

The Supreme Court while dealing with the question that whether the registration of the subsequent FIR is legally...

High Court Cannot Grant An Interim Order In A Second Appeal, Without Framing Substantial Question Of Law As Required To Be Framed Under Section...

A Bench of Justice J.B.Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan while dealing with an Appeal against an Interim Order...