An Appeal Under Payment of Wages Act, 1936 is Not Maintainable Unless Accompanied by The Certificate of Deposition of Awarded Amount

Date:

Share post:

An Appeal Under Payment of Wages Act, 1936 is Not Maintainable Unless Accompanied by The Certificate of Deposition of Awarded Amount

A Single Bench of Justice Vinod Chatterjee Koul of High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh while dealing with the writ petitions challenging the Award Passed Authority under Payment of Wages Act, 1936 and also the Orders passed by the Appellate Authority on the ground that the same have been passed without Appreciation of the provisions of the Act and that the Appellate Court has dismissed the appeals while observing that under Section 17 (1A) of the Act no appeal shall lie unless the Memorandum of Appeal is accompanied by a certificate issued by the Authority to the effect that appellant has deposited the amount payable under the direction appealed against and there is no escape from this mandatory provision of law.

The Court while referring to the legislative intent of the Act of 1936 held that the Condition as envisaged in Sec 17(1A) is mandatory and as such any person aggrieved of the Award passed by the Authority under the Act is required to fulfill the mandatory condition of appending the certificate from the Authority to the effect that he deposited the amount payable under the orders of the Authority. The court further held that the provisions of Sec 17(1A) of the Act are mandatory in nature, in as much as the use of the word “shall” used in Sec 17 (1A) of the Act indicates that the said amount is mandatorily to be deposited before the Authority, failing which the appeal would be treated as defective and would not be heard until and unless the defect was removed.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Trending

Related articles

Section 124 Of The Air Force Act, 1950 Can Be Invoked Only Upon Completion of The Investigation & The Presentation of Report/Chargesheet : J&K&L...

The Single Bench of Justice Javed Iqbal Wani while deciding two clubbed petitions under Section 528 Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita...

Only High Court in Exercise of Extraordinary Jurisdiction under Article 226 Can in Exceptional Circumstances Condone The Delay Occasioned in Filing An Appeal Against...

A division Bench of J&K High Court comprising Justice Sanjeev Kumar and Justice Rajesh Sekhri has reiterated that...

Whether A Letters Patent Appeal is Maintainable Against An Order/Judgment Passed By A Single Judge in Exercise of Criminal Jurisdiction?: JK&L HC Refers The...

A Division Bench of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court comprising Justice Sanjeev Kumar and Justice Sanjay Dhar...

Authority Exercising Revisional Jurisdiction Under Section 15 of J&K Land Revenue Act Cannot Summarily Decide The Issues Involved in The Case But The Same Needs To...

A Single Bench of Justice Javed Iqbal has held that athough the Power of Revision by Divisional Commissioner and Financial Commissioner  is exercisable...