WRIT PETITION CANNOT BE FILED ON ASSUMPTIONS AND APPREHENSIONS: J&K&L HC DENIES INTEREFERENCE UNDER ARTICLE 226

Date:

Share post:

WRIT PETITION CANNOT BE FILED ON ASSUMPTIONS AND APPREHENSIONS: J&K&L HC DENIES INTEREFERENCE UNDER ARTICLE 226

The Hon’ble High Court of J&K and Ladakh in a Petition wherein the Petitioners, being aspirants of various exams conducted by the Services Selection Board (SSB), called into question the award of contract in favor of one of the Respondents, M/s Aptech Limited, by the Government/SSB for the conduct of various examinations through online Computer Based Test (CBT) on the ground that the said agency has a tainted past record and has also been blacklisted once, and as such would fail in conducting the examination fairly, held that a Writ Petition cannot be filed on mere apprehensions, without any cause of action being accrued to the Petitioners.

Though the Court observed that the law is settled that institution of writ proceedings need not await actual prejudice and adverse effect and consequences, however, the apprehension of harm must be well founded. In the said case, the Government had already constituted a Review Committee to look into the conduct of JKSSB and M/S Aptech Ltd, and as such, the Hon’ble Court held that since the apprehensions of the Petitioners have already been addressed by the Government, no interference by the Court is warranted under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The Hon’ble Court disposed-off the Writ Petition by, inter-alia, directing the Review Committee to submit its report within ten days from the date of judgment.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Trending

Related articles

Supreme Court Directs High Courts To Issue Directions to Their Respective District Judiciary For Ensuring Disposal of Execution Petitions within Six Months

The Apex Court in its latest pronouncement, while deciding appeals against common judgment and order passed by the Madras High...

Supreme Court Lays Down The Principles Regarding The Permissibility Of Registration Of Second FIR

The Supreme Court while dealing with the question that whether the registration of the subsequent FIR is legally...

High Court Cannot Grant An Interim Order In A Second Appeal, Without Framing Substantial Question Of Law As Required To Be Framed Under Section...

A Bench of Justice J.B.Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan while dealing with an Appeal against an Interim Order...