WRIT PETITION CANNOT BE FILED ON ASSUMPTIONS AND APPREHENSIONS: J&K&L HC DENIES INTEREFERENCE UNDER ARTICLE 226

Date:

Share post:

WRIT PETITION CANNOT BE FILED ON ASSUMPTIONS AND APPREHENSIONS: J&K&L HC DENIES INTEREFERENCE UNDER ARTICLE 226

The Hon’ble High Court of J&K and Ladakh in a Petition wherein the Petitioners, being aspirants of various exams conducted by the Services Selection Board (SSB), called into question the award of contract in favor of one of the Respondents, M/s Aptech Limited, by the Government/SSB for the conduct of various examinations through online Computer Based Test (CBT) on the ground that the said agency has a tainted past record and has also been blacklisted once, and as such would fail in conducting the examination fairly, held that a Writ Petition cannot be filed on mere apprehensions, without any cause of action being accrued to the Petitioners.

Though the Court observed that the law is settled that institution of writ proceedings need not await actual prejudice and adverse effect and consequences, however, the apprehension of harm must be well founded. In the said case, the Government had already constituted a Review Committee to look into the conduct of JKSSB and M/S Aptech Ltd, and as such, the Hon’ble Court held that since the apprehensions of the Petitioners have already been addressed by the Government, no interference by the Court is warranted under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The Hon’ble Court disposed-off the Writ Petition by, inter-alia, directing the Review Committee to submit its report within ten days from the date of judgment.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Trending

Related articles

Client Bound by Lawyer’s Consent; Cannot Challenge Order Passed on Recorded Consent: J&K High Court

In a reiteration of the sanctity of courtroom concessions, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh...

The Proceedings Held By An Earlier Arbitrator Can Not Be Nullified on Substitution of Arbitrator By The High Court: Supreme Court

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that High Courts cannot interfere with ongoing...

Liberty Cannot Wait: Supreme Court Flags Bail Pendency, Registrar Generals Directed to Circulate Order Among the Hon’ble Judges of High Courts for Expeditious Disposal...

In order centred on personal liberty, the Supreme Court has observed that despite repeated reminders, High Courts have...

Post-2013 Land Acquisition Awards Governed by New Act; Delay in Appeals Can Be Condoned: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has  clarified the scope and applicability of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land...